Results 1 to 12 of 12
-
05-24-2015, 04:22 AM #1
Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 79
- Rep Points
- 194.0
- Mentioned
- 10 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 2
1 out of 1 members liked this post.
Reputation
Turbo M5 vs 750whp CTS-V
https://youtu.be/54nkXRRsIP4
E39 M5 with a S52 swap, Precision 6266 CEA, 100 octane + water/meth, 31 psi.
-
05-27-2015, 10:18 AM #2
Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2011
- Posts
- 270
- Rep Points
- 1,111.2
- Mentioned
- 21 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 12
Reputation
Great kill! But good god whats not to love about a 750whp CTS V Wagon!!!
-
05-27-2015, 01:56 PM #3
Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23
- Rep Points
- 33.1
- Mentioned
- 0 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 0
Reputation
Ill take that Hell Wagon! Great car. nice kill.
-
06-02-2015, 04:20 PM #4
Regular User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- SoCal
- Posts
- 148,075
- Rep Points
- 47,180.7
- Mentioned
- 2523 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 472
Reputation
S52 turbo swapped BMW E39 M5 vs. 750 wheel horsepower Cadillac CTS-V wagon roll on
Great run here from BimmerBoost member @Omni who continues to run his E39 M5 hard. If you are not familiar with his E39 M5 with over 700 wheel horsepower courtesy of an S52 inline-6 swap that he then turbocharged take a look at this article and appreciate the awesomeness that is his M5.
We have seen this E39 M5 in action before making short work of a tuned BMW F13 M6 Gran Coupe. The M6 is fast, sure, but this M5 is a lot faster. Well, this time around the M5 has some stiffer competition from a Cadillac CTS-V wagon with ~750 rear wheel horsepower.
The CTS-V wagon is of course heavier than the E39 at roughly 4400 pounds. Despite that weight this wagon moves! The torque advantage down low shows as it pulls off the bat. Once that turbo in the M5 gets going though the E39 closes the gap and pulls ahead.
Just a great run from two beasts, nicely done @Omni.
E39 M5 with a S52 swap, Precision 6266 CEA, 100 octane + water/meth, 31 psi.
-
06-02-2015, 05:46 PM #5
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- Israel
- Posts
- 68
- Rep Points
- 173.9
- Mentioned
- 3 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 2
Reputation
BEAST!
-
06-02-2015, 07:49 PM #6
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2015
- Posts
- 577
- Rep Points
- 485.1
- Mentioned
- 19 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 5
Reputation
Hell yeah!
-
06-02-2015, 08:15 PM #7
Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 1,195
- Rep Points
- 1,701.4
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 18
Reputation
@Omni thanks for sharing all these vidz your car is SICK!!!
-
06-02-2015, 09:20 PM #8
Regular User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- SoCal
- Posts
- 148,075
- Rep Points
- 47,180.7
- Mentioned
- 2523 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 472
Reputation
It definitely is.
Originally Posted by SpeedLimit?
He does a good job on the vids too. No nonsense.
-
06-03-2015, 02:46 PM #9
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Posts
- 532
- Rep Points
- 263.5
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
Reputation
.31 drag coefficient for the e39 chassis if I remember right. But bad ass run. Mad respect taking down a wagon.
-
06-03-2015, 03:35 PM #10
Regular User
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Location
- SoCal
- Posts
- 148,075
- Rep Points
- 47,180.7
- Mentioned
- 2523 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 472
Reputation
This E39 has taken down everything it has run. Car is fast. Originally Posted by onisyndicate
-
06-03-2015, 08:38 PM #11
Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2013
- Location
- AZ
- Posts
- 191
- Rep Points
- 254.3
- Mentioned
- 28 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
Reputation
Welp. Time to swap out the N54.
-
06-10-2015, 02:45 PM #12
Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2012
- Posts
- 79
- Rep Points
- 194.0
- Mentioned
- 10 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 2
Reputation
Hahaha i wouldn't go that far. I would've done a N54 swap if the electronics weren't so complicated. Originally Posted by kommodore
Quote
f30n55, we...
f30n55 is now here!