RFP OTS STAGE 3 MAPS

Author DeanerBeamer
Uploaded 11-11-2018, 10:42 PM
Total Files

Files

You must be logged in to view the files.

STAGE 3 RFP OTS MAPS ARE FINALLY READY!!!

Mods: CP+BOV(DV)| FMIC | DPs | Inlets | *Stage 2 pump*

***Stage 2 pump is needed for E85 maps***

Change log to Stage 1/1.5/2 maps:
*Reworked boost for smoother curve, more aggressive.
*All maps S1-3 have built in Turbo protection. Prevents turbo from over-spinning if you have a leak by limiting WGDC under 87-88%. (something other guys don't have!)
*All maps fully unlocked.

Stage 3 maps:
*Boost Target is set to 19-20.5 psi (depending on your elevation) on E85 maps and 18-19 on 91/93
*Reworked Vanos
*Reworked Ignition
*Reworked Fuel Bank 1/2
*Reworked Fuel Scalar 1/2

Next Step:
Implementing INA0S (335 IS models)
Adding 95 Octane maps (Friends in Europe)
Adding Race Gas maps

Donations:
Paypal - [email protected] (no 'g')

MSD 80 is I8A0S (Pre LCI N54)
MSD 81 is IJE0S (LCI N54)

V9 CHANGE LOG:

*Low end Ignition adjusted
*Fuel reworked for more HP and TQ (same as Stage 2)
*VANOS adjusted to create a bit more LSA and gobble more air
*6AT and DCT Transmissions will behave more aggressivel.
Shifts will be more "slap in the face" feels
*Added Boost X Gear X RPM for 1st and 2nd gear (Drag Racing Purposes)
*Added "Slap in the face" shift. Now your 6AT and DCT Transmissions will stay in boost and shift with speed of light.

Dean@RFP -

Its not crank. Calibrated to whp BTW.
Tested stateside and numbers are similar

Jerain -

The two dyno sheets from Sportech Performance you've posted here yesterday are from a French company and I know those Soft-Engine dyno's (been on one myself) and they will give you crank HP (max CV with DIN correction) on the dynopaper not whp. So your map on 98Ron is 392hp and MHD is 402hp with MHD having a much better torque curve IMO.

Jerain -

Originally Posted by DutchBMW

Well, this is probably a perfect example of why numbers on paper and real life don’t always match in terms of ‘feel’.
The MHD map was not smooth at all for me, really agressive and had boost issues, the RFP map is faster and smoother.
I also didn’t expect this, but was willing to give it a shot and i’m superhappy with it.

Also, the HP line is flatter on the RFP map, which translates to linear acceleration (also taking shifts into account).
If shifting to a higher gear, you need more torque to keep accelerating at the same pace.
Having a flat HP curve gives this character and i like it, but it’s personal preference though..

If you’re looking for a flat torque curve (more N/A feel), this is not the map for you.

A "feeling" does not prove anything. Flat, high and consistent torque curve is always better I think. Can you post a datazap link here so I can compare and maybe try the OTS map?

DutchBMW -

Originally Posted by Jerain

A "feeling" does not prove anything. Flat, high and consistent torque curve is always better I think. Can you post a datazap link here so I can compare and maybe try the OTS map?

It does prove everything for me!
A ‘nice’ torque curve that drives like crap in the real world is something i wouldn’t want.
I want a flat HP curve and torque that’s smooth and not peaky.
This car is my daily after all, but to each their own i guess, i don’t have to convince you.

I will make a log when i have the time.
Just try it out, if you’re curious.
You have nothing to lose and i think you’ll like it..

eyelobes -

I just want to try stage 3 since MHD doesn't utilize my inlets

DutchBMW -

Good point, since my only option with inlets was a custom tune!
I think meth is also very helpful at this point ;-)

Dean@RFP -

I am going to be updating maps to V10 version soon. There is a tad too much base for Stage 2 and 3 between MAF 120-270 for those at sea level. Its quiet awesome to see stock turbos hit over 400 MAF in some cases